Ontario's Premier Accountability Dashboard · Queen's Park Watch
Ontario's Secret Advertising Machine: $452 Million in Partisan Spending
December 2, 2025
TL;DR
The Ford government has spent $452 million in taxpayer-funded advertising since 2018 — repeatedly refusing to disclose campaign costs until forced by FOI — while the Auditor General found 38% of spending was designed to promote the governing party, and the firm behind the most controversial ad is run by Doug Ford's campaign manager's brother-in-law.
Why It Matters
Ontario's Government Advertising Act was designed with a clear principle: public money cannot be used for the governing party's political benefit. Under Dalton McGuinty's original 2004 version of the law, the Auditor General had authority to block any campaign whose "primary purpose" was to foster a positive impression of the governing party. That oversight was gutted in 2015 when the Wynne Liberals narrowed the definition to only prohibit ads featuring politicians by name, face, or party logo. The Ford PCs campaigned in 2018 on a promise to restore the original rules. Once in power, they never did — and proceeded to exploit the loophole with unprecedented aggression.
The pattern of secrecy began in 2019. When the Ford government launched anti-carbon tax radio and TV ads called "One Little Nickel," Treasury Board President Peter Bethlenfalvy refused to reveal the cost, saying only: "We've got a budget for letting the people of Ontario know exactly what is going on." The Globe and Mail reported the refusal. Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk later confirmed the campaign cost $4 million and said she would have rejected it as partisan — but could not under the weakened law. The same pattern repeated with "Ontario Is Getting Stronger" in 2022 ($13.5 million), "It's Happening Here" in 2023-24 (eventually $40 million via two separate FOI requests), and "Protect Ontario" in 2025 — each time requiring journalists to file Freedom of Information requests to learn what public money was being spent.
In December 2025, Auditor General Shelley Spence reported that Ontario spent a record $111.9 million on advertising in 2024-25 — the highest in provincial history. She found that 38% of campaigns were "designed to foster a positive impression of the Progressive Conservatives, rather than give Ontarians information about government programs or services." The $43 million "It's Happening Here" campaign alone aired during the Super Bowl, the Oscars, the Emmy Awards, and NHL prime time. Spence was direct: "Some of the ads are quite promotional for the governing party. They aren't really providing really good, solid information to the citizens of Ontario."
The advertising machine also has a documented insider pipeline. The controversial Reagan anti-tariff commercial — which ultimately angered Donald Trump enough to halt trade talks — was produced by Creative Currency, an ad firm run by Dennis Matthews. Matthews' wife and PC campaign manager Kory Teneycke's wife are sisters. Creative Currency received $4.8 million from the Ontario PC party since 2022 and approximately $2.2 million in taxpayer-funded government contracts. VP Lauren McDonald previously served as Director of Marketing in the Premier's own office. Global News confirmed the ties between the firm and Ford's political network.
Beyond partisan content, the government has actively prevented accountability about spending before the public can act on the information. The government consistently stated that ad costs "will be released through public accounts" — a document published months after the spending occurs. The January 2025 snap election was called while a $40 million domestic ad blitz was still running, and only when the government entered caretaker mode were 15 of its own flagged campaigns paused. The combination of a weakened advertising law, routine refusals to disclose spending, and a contractor network connected to the Premier's political operation raises questions that Ontario's accountability institutions have consistently flagged but cannot currently enforce.
Legal Actions
Auditor General Shelley Spence's December 2025 annual report found Ontario spent a record $111.9 million on advertising in 2024-25 — the highest in provincial history. The report found that 38% of campaigns were designed to foster a positive impression of the governing party rather than inform the public, and would not have been approved under Ontario's original 2004 Government Advertising Act. The government acknowledged the findings and took no remedial action.
The Legislative Assembly's Public Accounts Committee recommended in October 2025 that the government restore the Auditor General's pre-2015 authority to block partisan advertising and extend oversight to digital advertising channels. The Ford government's formal response was to maintain "the status quo," rejecting all substantive recommendations.
NDP Leader Marit Stiles introduced Bill 54 to restore the Auditor General's pre-2015 authority to review and block partisan government advertising — including extending oversight to digital advertising platforms. The bill remained stalled at first reading as of early 2026. The Ford government has not indicated any intention to pass legislation reforming advertising rules.
Rippling Effects
The weakening of the Government Advertising Act in 2015 — done by the Liberals, exploited by the PCs — has created a structural accountability gap that cannot be fixed by the Auditor General alone. AG Spence's annual reports flag partisan spending but have no enforcement power: the government is informed, acknowledges the findings, and continues. The Public Accounts Committee recommended restoring the AG's pre-2015 authority and extending oversight to digital advertising — but the Ford government's response was to maintain "the status quo." Ontario's Auditor General cannot veto a single ad regardless of how partisan it is.
Digital advertising has become a parallel, unregulated spending channel. The government spent $12.8 million on digital ads excluded from the Auditor General's review in 2023-24 — a more than 250% increase from the year before. Ads placed on Meta platforms, X (formerly Twitter), and other digital channels fall entirely outside the Government Advertising Act review framework. The Auditor General has called for this gap to be closed. The government has not acted. This means a growing fraction of public spending on political self-promotion is invisible even to Ontario's watchdog.
The Creative Currency/Teneycke network illustrates how the advertising apparatus has been integrated into the Ford government's political infrastructure. The same organizational circle — campaign manager, his brother-in-law's ad firm, a VP who previously ran marketing out of the Premier's office — produces both partisan PC election materials and taxpayer-funded government advertising. Whether this constitutes a breach of any specific rule is a legal question that has not been formally examined. But it represents exactly the blurring of government and party that the original 2004 advertising law was designed to prevent.
The FOI barrier compounds the problem. Costs of major campaigns are routinely withheld until journalists file formal access-to-information requests — a process that takes 30 or more days and requires knowing what to ask for. The "It's Happening Here" campaign required two separate FOI requests to piece together the full $40 million cost. As recently as 2025, the government launched a new "Protect Ontario" commercial and again refused to reveal its cost, leaving the public no way to know how much of their money was being spent.
Until the law changes, Ontario taxpayers have no legal protection against their money being used to re-elect the government that spends it. NDP Leader Marit Stiles introduced Bill 54 to restore partisan advertising restrictions — it remains stalled at first reading. Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy has offered the definitive government position: "I am never going to apologize for promoting Ontario."