Ontario's Premier Accountability Dashboard · Queen's Park Watch

The School Lands Sell-Off

March 20, 2026

TL;DR

The Ford government passed legislation giving the Minister of Education power to force school boards to sell public land to private developers, then used manufactured financial crises to take over six school boards — handing control of an estimated $60 billion in public land to provincial-appointed supervisors with real estate backgrounds and no education experience.

Why It Matters

Bill 98, passed in June 2023, fundamentally shifted who controls public school land in Ontario. Before the bill, decisions about selling school properties required the involvement of locally elected trustees accountable to their communities. After it, the Minister of Education gained the power to force boards to sell land not projected to be needed for students within ten years — including to private developers — without meaningful democratic input.

The 2025 school board takeovers compounded this. Rather than reverse the chronic underfunding that left boards scrambling to sell assets, the Ford government cited the resulting deficits as "mismanagement" and appointed supervisors to run the boards. The TDSB's supervisor, Rohit Gupta, is the managing partner of Harrington Place Advisors — an M&A firm that, by its own description, specializes in "identifying high value opportunities for public sector assets." He has no known experience in public education and earns $350,000 annually in the role.

By taking over the TDSB, the province also seized control of the Toronto Lands Corporation (TLC), the school board's real estate subsidiary that manages its $20 billion land portfolio. Shortly after the takeover, public meetings were no longer livestreamed and the TLC's governance documents were pulled from public access. Gupta told the TLC board in November 2025 that he was working with the Ministry on a "shareholder direction" — a fundamental change to the TLC's mandate — but declined to say what it would contain.

As NDP education critic Chandra Pasma observed, the supervisors' "only qualifications are that they are conservative insiders." MPP Peter Tabuns put it more directly, questioning whether Ford was imposing the takeover "to control the sale of real property owned by the TDSB for the benefit of his developer friends, the way he did with the Greenbelt."

Rippling Effects

Once public land is sold, it is gone. As housing researcher Mark Richardson has noted, "if we do try and get it back, it's going to be prohibitively expensive." Toronto is a rapidly growing city with a documented shortage of school space in new communities — strategic land retention is essential to building new schools where families will live. Selling off school sites to developers now means communities may face permanent shortfalls of public facilities in the future.

The TDSB had been pioneering a different model: instead of outright sales, the Toronto Lands Corporation was developing partnerships that built schools within mixed-use housing projects — keeping land public while generating community benefit. That approach is now under threat. The appointed supervisor has signalled structural changes to how the TLC operates, and both the TDSB and TCDSB are currently litigating at the Ontario Land Tribunal to resist provincial moves permitting large-scale development on school properties near transit stations.

The pattern mirrors the Greenbelt scandal in structure: use an emergency or crisis narrative to claim oversight authority, install insiders with real estate backgrounds, reduce public transparency, and quietly rewrite the rules governing what happens to the land. With an estimated $60 billion in school board land across Ontario now subject to ministerial direction, the potential scale of this transfer of public wealth to private hands is enormous.

For students and families, the immediate consequences are already visible. Two Toronto secondary schools — Eastdale and Heydon Park — have been directed to close enrollment for incoming grade 9+ students, a precursor to closure. Special education programs have had class sizes increased unilaterally. The democratic check that elected trustees once provided — the ability of local communities to push back on decisions about their schools — has been suspended indefinitely.