Ontario's Premier Accountability Dashboard · Queen's Park Watch
Fire Season 2026: First Nations Burn While Ford Government Sat on Wildfire Cuts
July 15, 2026
TL;DR
A wave of wildfires in northwestern Ontario in July 2026 destroyed homes in Collins First Nation and forced evacuations of multiple First Nations communities, while opposition parties allege the Ford government cut wildfire response funding and let the wildland firefighting force shrink despite union warnings.
Why It Matters
The 2026 wildfire season has devastated First Nations communities in Ontario's northwest with a severity that outpaces the province's stated response capacity. Global News reported that Collins First Nation was effectively destroyed, with Chief Helen Paavola describing residents who "ran out of their houses with only the clothes on their back." The Globe and Mail documented evacuations or evacuation orders spanning at least eight First Nations communities plus the Ignace area, alongside 148 to 160 active fires — over half of them uncontrolled. This is not an abstract climate statistic; it is families losing homes in communities that were already among the most remote and under-resourced in the province.
Natural Resources Minister Mike Harris confirmed the province had deployed several hundred wildland firefighters and roughly 40 aircraft, and pointed to a $150 million emergency firefighting budget for 2026-27. But he did not directly address the central allegation raised by opposition leaders: that the government had, in the years leading up to this fire season, cut wildfire response and emergency preparedness funding and allowed the wildland firefighting force to shrink. NDP Leader Marit Stiles made this allegation publicly, framing the current crisis as the foreseeable result of underinvestment the union representing firefighters had warned about. Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner similarly criticized what he called "continued underfunding of emergency firefighting budgets." These are attributed political claims — the specific scope and dollar value of any funding reductions could not be independently verified from a neutral source, and should be read as contested allegations rather than established fact.
What is verifiable is the gap between the scale of this year's fire activity and the resources the province says are responding to it. Whether that gap reflects genuine underfunding, the scale of an unusually severe fire season, or both, is precisely the question the opposition's allegations raise and that an independent accounting — such as an Auditor General review — would be needed to settle. Until such a review exists, this scandal page documents the verified facts of the crisis and the nature of the funding dispute, without asserting a specific figure was cut.
The pattern of Indigenous communities in Ontario's north bearing the sharpest edge of underinvestment and delayed government response is not new. It echoes concerns raised in the province's handling of Ring of Fire development and Indigenous consent, where First Nations communities argued they were not adequately resourced to participate in decisions affecting their territory, and in the systemic failures documented in the Thunder Bay jail and Mamakwa inquest. Whether or not the specific wildfire funding cuts alleged by the NDP are ultimately confirmed, the recurring theme — northern Indigenous communities absorbing the consequences of resourcing decisions made at Queen's Park — is well documented across these cases.
Rippling Effects
The immediate human cost is displacement and loss: families evacuated from Armstrong, Lac La Croix First Nation, Whitesand First Nation, Gull Bay First Nation, Lac des Mille Lacs First Nation, Cat Lake First Nation, and McDowell Lake First Nation, on top of a First Nation community — Collins — whose homes and buildings were destroyed outright. The Globe and Mail's reporting makes clear this is a multi-community crisis unfolding simultaneously, not an isolated incident, straining emergency shelter, transportation, and support capacity across the region at once.
If the opposition's underfunding allegations are eventually substantiated by an independent body, the political consequences would compound an existing narrative about the Ford government's treatment of northern Indigenous communities on resourcing and consultation. If they are not substantiated, or turn out to reflect the scale of an exceptional fire season rather than a funding decision, that too matters for how the province should plan its emergency preparedness budgets going forward — this year's fires will not be the last.
Minister Mike Harris's response — emphasizing current-year deployment numbers rather than answering the multi-year funding question — leaves the underlying dispute unresolved. Global News quoted Harris describing "several hundred wildland firefighters, along with 40 aircraft, including helicopters and waterbombers" as involved in suppression efforts, a response that speaks to this season's deployment without confirming or denying whether prior-year cuts left the province less prepared than it should have been.
Longer term, this crisis will likely feed into broader debates about Ontario's climate adaptation and emergency preparedness funding, and specifically whether northern and Indigenous communities receive the resourcing needed to withstand an increasingly severe fire season — a question connected to the resourcing disputes already visible in Ring of Fire development. Whatever the eventual accounting of this year's wildfire budget shows, the communities that bore the immediate cost were First Nations in the province's northwest.